<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colbert skewers Bush, while media drop ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2006/05/01/colbert-skewers-bush-while-media-drop-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2006/05/01/colbert-skewers-bush-while-media-drop-ball/</link>
	<description>Ramblings by a former physics teacher teaching EFL in Jishou, China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: eljefe</title>
		<link>http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2006/05/01/colbert-skewers-bush-while-media-drop-ball/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>eljefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 13:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/?p=133#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Actually, I agree. If Colbert was serious about playing to his audience, he bombed miserably. But I suspect that had in mind to do exactly what he did -- skewer the pres and needle the press. I can&#039;t imagine any performer wanting to bomb otherwise.

My point is that the (liberal) blogosphere is perceiving sinister motives where there are none.  The media didn&#039;t intentionally suppress the Colbert bit -- it just wasn&#039;t news, or at least as &quot;newsy&quot; as the Bush-Bush II bit. Still, Colbert&#039;s criticism still should have deserved at least a sentence, since Colbert hit some nerves.

Speaking as a former reporter, my perception is that the press corps in Washington has lost its bite. Colbert&#039;s dig about the media parroting White House press releases was an exaggeration, but not without some grain of truth. In years past, the Washington press corps was like a pack of pitbulls during WH press conferences. Now, it seems only Helen Thomas consistently challenges the administration, which Colbert&#039;s video also satirizes. The Fourth Estate now seems too complacent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I agree. If Colbert was serious about playing to his audience, he bombed miserably. But I suspect that had in mind to do exactly what he did &#8212; skewer the pres and needle the press. I can&#8217;t imagine any performer wanting to bomb otherwise.</p>
<p>My point is that the (liberal) blogosphere is perceiving sinister motives where there are none.  The media didn&#8217;t intentionally suppress the Colbert bit &#8212; it just wasn&#8217;t news, or at least as &#8220;newsy&#8221; as the Bush-Bush II bit. Still, Colbert&#8217;s criticism still should have deserved at least a sentence, since Colbert hit some nerves.</p>
<p>Speaking as a former reporter, my perception is that the press corps in Washington has lost its bite. Colbert&#8217;s dig about the media parroting White House press releases was an exaggeration, but not without some grain of truth. In years past, the Washington press corps was like a pack of pitbulls during WH press conferences. Now, it seems only Helen Thomas consistently challenges the administration, which Colbert&#8217;s video also satirizes. The Fourth Estate now seems too complacent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

