<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let’s look at creationism from the religious angle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2007/06/04/lets-look-at-creationism-from-the-religious-angle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2007/06/04/lets-look-at-creationism-from-the-religious-angle/</link>
	<description>Ramblings by a former physics teacher teaching EFL in Jishou, China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: wheatdogg</title>
		<link>http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2007/06/04/lets-look-at-creationism-from-the-religious-angle/#comment-23422</link>
		<dc:creator>wheatdogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2007/06/04/lets-look-at-creationism-from-the-religious-angle/#comment-23422</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Dan. As far as I know, many of these scientists were hoodwinked by the AiG folks to sign the document, and some have disavowed their signatures.

You should check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pandasthumb.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Panda&#039;s Thumb&lt;/a&gt;, if you have not already, as well as the sites I have linked to here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Dan. As far as I know, many of these scientists were hoodwinked by the AiG folks to sign the document, and some have disavowed their signatures.</p>
<p>You should check out <a href="http://www.pandasthumb.org" rel="nofollow">The Panda&#8217;s Thumb</a>, if you have not already, as well as the sites I have linked to here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Vojir</title>
		<link>http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2007/06/04/lets-look-at-creationism-from-the-religious-angle/#comment-18643</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Vojir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2007/06/04/lets-look-at-creationism-from-the-religious-angle/#comment-18643</guid>
		<description>I fully realize that you (or your organization) may not wish to be aggressive in regards to a subject like creationism, but I thought you might want to help distribute a list to scientists who really are concerned about the new Creation Museum. 

Let’s face it: we’re at war. And when you don’t have any money to help your soldiers, you wind up giving them whatever ammunition you can and in any form. In my blog, under the heading “Help for REAL scientists”, is a lengthy annotated list culled (mostly) from Answers in Genesis. It took me a very long while, but I went through most of the names of the “scientists” who support Ken Ham and the Creation Museum and made some comments. See if you or anyone you know can pick out some names and, if possible, refute their claims.

If each scientist in a particular field concentrates on refuting just 5 &quot;scientists&quot; think of what an impact that would make! Please share this list with any scientist or groups of scientists you think might use this bit of “ammunition”. If you have any suggestions for other writers, editors, or associations I might contact, please feel free to do so.
 
I really hope it helps.

Dan Vojir
San Francisco
dan-vojir@sbcglobal.net

http://thedevilanddanvojir.blogspot.com

Dan Vojir is a San Francisco writer and the author of the upcoming book Sacred Cows Make the Best Hamburgers. 


PS: I am VERY new at blogging and, like everyone else, I would like to be read and commented on by as many people as possible. If you have any suggestions or referrals, please let me know. I will be forever grateful.
Dan Vojir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully realize that you (or your organization) may not wish to be aggressive in regards to a subject like creationism, but I thought you might want to help distribute a list to scientists who really are concerned about the new Creation Museum. </p>
<p>Let’s face it: we’re at war. And when you don’t have any money to help your soldiers, you wind up giving them whatever ammunition you can and in any form. In my blog, under the heading “Help for REAL scientists”, is a lengthy annotated list culled (mostly) from Answers in Genesis. It took me a very long while, but I went through most of the names of the “scientists” who support Ken Ham and the Creation Museum and made some comments. See if you or anyone you know can pick out some names and, if possible, refute their claims.</p>
<p>If each scientist in a particular field concentrates on refuting just 5 &#8220;scientists&#8221; think of what an impact that would make! Please share this list with any scientist or groups of scientists you think might use this bit of “ammunition”. If you have any suggestions for other writers, editors, or associations I might contact, please feel free to do so.</p>
<p>I really hope it helps.</p>
<p>Dan Vojir<br />
San Francisco<br />
<a href="mailto:dan-vojir@sbcglobal.net">dan-vojir@sbcglobal.net</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thedevilanddanvojir.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://thedevilanddanvojir.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>Dan Vojir is a San Francisco writer and the author of the upcoming book Sacred Cows Make the Best Hamburgers. </p>
<p>PS: I am VERY new at blogging and, like everyone else, I would like to be read and commented on by as many people as possible. If you have any suggestions or referrals, please let me know. I will be forever grateful.<br />
Dan Vojir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

