Wheat-dogg’s world

Ramblings by a former physics teacher teaching ESL in China

Wheat-dogg’s world RSS Feed
 

Wheat-dogg’s world

 

Archive for 2007

Aussie creation geologist joins Creation Museum staff

The folks at Answers in Genesis are crowing about the latest addition to the YabbaDabbaDo Museum staff, geologist Andrew Snelling, “one of the world’s most respected creation scientists (sic).”

Snelling, who holds a doctorate in geology science from the University of Sydney in Australia, used to work for Ken Ham, the AiG head, in the Land Down Under. Snelling has focused on disproving the commonly accepted idea among most geologists that the Earth’s crust has been formed and shaped over millions of years. Like most Young Earth Creationists, he contends that the earth is no older than 6,000 years, and that features like the Grand Canyon were formed by the Great Flood.

Snelling’s work rests on his theory that radioactive dating methods, by which geologists estimate the age of rock, are based on a false assumption: that the rate at which radioisotopes decay has been constant throughout history.

Modern science assumes that all radioisotopes of a certain type are created equal. That is, a sample of carbon-14 from the US is identical to one from Borneo, or a sample of uranium-238 from Earth is the same as one from the Moon. Their nuclear structures, and the laws of quantum mechanics, determine their decay rates and thus their half-lives.

Most geologists also assume that the elements today are identical to those in the past. That is, a sample of U-238 now should behave the same as one from deep inside the Earth (or anywhere else in the universe for that matter). This assumption (and it’s a pretty good one) enables geologists to “date” rocks and the sediments surrounding those rocks. Knowing the age of the sediments enables archaeologists to date fossils and human artifacts.

More Creation Museum photos

On Flickr, here. Really, why bother going now?

The Geo Metro crosses the 200K barrier

That’s 200K miles, for your metric types. The happy event occurred just before we pulled up to an Arby’s drive-up window yesterday.

I bought this little car just after we returned from South Africa, to replace our Dodge Neon. I needed a commuter car, and the Metro fit the bill nicely. It had about 42,000 miles on it, and was in pretty good condition.

In fact, the car was trouble-free until an incompetent mechanic replaced the timing belt, but failed the retension it. After a few more thousand miles, the belt started to jump off the cogs, fouling up the valve timing. In a very short time, I had several bent valves and a useless motor.

A competent mechanic installed a used engine, and that four-banger has popped along just fine for the last 60,000 miles.

It’s small, but at 35 mpg, I’m not complaining — much.

A childhood influence, Don Herbert, dies

AP photo via Seattle PIBefore Bill Nye, the Science Guy, and Beekman, there was Mr Wizard. During the dim days of black-and-white broadcast TV, Don Herbert portrayed a kindly, soft-spoken science pal to scores of youngsters appearing on his show, and thousands of kids watching at home on the TV. I turned on “Watch Mr. Wizard” whenever it was on, and mourned its loss when it was canceled in 1964.

Now I mourn the loss of the man himself. Herbert died yesterday at age 89 at his California home, after suffering for years with bone cancer.

Herbert’s show, by today’s glitzy, high-tech standards, was slow and dull. Most kids nowadays would probably not have the patience to watch it all the through. But in the 1950s and early ’60s, that’s what TV was like. The appeal of Herbert’s show was the gee-whiz effect he created, encouraging kids to use household materials to discover science.

(You can order Mr Wizard programs here.)

One Mr Wizard trick I still use is his method of removing tarnish from silver. Fill a disposable aluminum-foil pan with hot water (or place a sheet of Al foil in a glass baking dish) and dissolve a teaspoon of salt and a teaspoon of baking soda in the water. Place the silver article in the water and wait. Gradually the tarnish (silver oxide) will leave and be deposited on the aluminum. Why? Because aluminum is more reactive than silver; oxygen would rather form an oxide with Al than with Ag.

Yet another godless visit to the Creation Museum

The folks at BluegrassRoots.com took a trip up I-75 to visit the Yabba-Dabba-Doo Museum in Petersburg. The more I see, the less I would want to shell out almost $20 to visit the place. I’ll just stay home and watch The 10 Commandments.

NYT to WSJ: Tell Murdoch “Drop dead”

Newspaper editorials rarely give advice to competing newspapers, but the family-owned The New York Times today urged family-owned Dow Jones Inc. and The Wall Street Journal to rebuff media mogul Rupert Murdoch’s bids to buy the organization.

Speaking of Murdoch’s courting of the owners of Dow Jones, the Bancrofts, the Times editors wrote:

Mr. Murdoch has dangled a hefty $5 billion before the family that has controlled The Journal for more than 100 years. Frankly, we hope the Bancrofts will find a way to continue producing their fine newspaper, or, failing that, find a buyer who is a safer bet to protect the newspaper for its readers.

Murdoch lords over a global media empire that includes outlets as diverse as Fox News Network, MySpace and The Times of London. Murdoch wants his media outlets to make money, so many observers — including the NYT — fear he will emasculate the fiercely independent journalism of the WSJ. Despite earlier promises to stay out of the prestigious London Times‘ news operations, Murdoch has quashed some news stories that might impinge on his bottom line.

Family-owned media outfits are a dying breed. It’s a rule of thumb that family-run enterprises rarely survive the third generation. We know all about this in Louisville, when the Bingham family sold The Courier-Journal and The Louisville Times to the Gannett Corp. in 1986, after controlling the C-J/T for almost 70 years.

Site’s back up

My webhost’s server was hacked day before yesterday, so my site’s been down while they rebuilt the server. Their last good backup was from May 19 and mine from the 24th, so my posts since the 19th were lost.

Thank Google! I was able to recover all but one of the lost posts by copying and pasting Google’s cached pages. The missing one I recovered from my own computer. Then I changed the posting dates by editing the database.

Nice to be back in business!

Milestones

My Sitemeter counter just crossed the 10,000 visits mark tonight. The details show a big spike in traffic in May.

column graph

The Wordpress stats plugin I use shows I have had more than 24,000 visits since I started the blog on Jan. 29, 2006.

My post on Conservapedia was digged (current diggs = 47), which brought in a bunch of visitors from digg.com.

Now if I can just get some people leaving comments … or at least dropping their spare change in my PayPal box … How about it, people?

If Wikipedia is bad, then Conservapedia is the utter pits.

We teachers have a bias against Wikipedia as reference material for students. While many entries are well written and accurate, there are many that are plain junk. It might be hard for a student to tell the good from the bad, so we typically advise either avoiding Wikipedia for formal research papers or supplementing it with more traditional sources.Enter Conservapedia, a so-called “trustworthy,” wiki-based encyclopedia. Founded by conservatives who believe Wikipedia has a liberal bias, Conservapedia endeavors to provide a more palatable online source to students, scholars and the idly curious.

Some of the science blogs I read have been dumping on Conservapedia lately, so I thought I would take a peek. I started with something I know pretty well, physics.

Now, Conservapedia is still being developed, so I was not expecting as an elaborate entry on physics as Wikipedia has. I was mortified, however, to read this entry, which I will reproduce here in its entirety to save you a click.

Physics is the study of nature, and is the science of studying the laws of God’s universe. Galileo was the first to discover and propose some of the fundamental laws of physics that we still realize today. He began by studying how a ball rolled down an incline and showed that its speed would be proportional to the height it started at. A scientist that studies physics is called a physicist.

Let’s look at creationism from the religious angle

Creationism as a “theory” does not agree with the overwhelming evidence for a 13-billion-year-old universe and a 4.6-Byo Earth. That much is clear. It (and the new Creation Museum in Petersburg, Ky.) also completely ignore centuries of careful Biblical scholarship and supporting archaelogical research.

There are two main ways to read the Bible, especially the Old Testament (OT). (1) As a document transmitted from God directly to Moses and other writers, which is the traditional Jewish and Christian view. (2) As the synthesis of a variety of sources, written by a variety of authors, who may or may not been divinely inspired, which has been the interpretation of many Jewish and Christian scholars since the 17th century.

[Islam, it should be noted, honors both the Old and New Testaments, but teaches that these scriptures have been corrupted. Only the Holy Quran as given to the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) communicates Allah’s true Word.]

Creationists are an extreme “camp” within category 1. They hold that every single word in Scripture is not just divinely transmitted but must also be taken literally. In particular, the first few chapters of Genesis, to creationists, are a word-for-word account of how God created the universe, the Earth and everything on it. They place special emphasis on the separate creation of humans (Adam and Eve), which they insist is evidence that humans are not animals like God’s other creations and could not possibly be descended from earlier primates.

Page 5 of 8« First...«34567»...Last »

Buddy, can you spare a dime?

Search this site

Jishou, Hunan, Weather

  • Overcast
  • Jishou HN CN
  • Temperature: 54°F
  • Humidity: 76.5%
  • Wind: N at 2 mph
  • Dew Point: 46°F
  • Clouds: Overcast
  • Barometer: 30.24 inHg

Pages

Archives by month

These ads are placed here automatically. Their presence is not an endorsement.