<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious runaway Rifqa Bary back in Ohio, in foster care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2009/10/29/religious-runaway-rifqa-bary-back-in-ohio-in-foster-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2009/10/29/religious-runaway-rifqa-bary-back-in-ohio-in-foster-care/</link>
	<description>Ramblings by a former physics teacher teaching ESL in China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eljefe</title>
		<link>http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2009/10/29/religious-runaway-rifqa-bary-back-in-ohio-in-foster-care/comment-page-1/#comment-49027</link>
		<dc:creator>eljefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/?p=1242#comment-49027</guid>
		<description>Paul Lanier (Facebook):

&quot;What a strange case!  I&#039;m not entirely sure what to think.  However, it does seem like in cases like this, a thoughtful judge would consider it from a &quot;secularized&quot; or &quot;laws-in-common&quot; approach, trying to see all aspects of the case and make a just decision.   A secular approach here  merely means that the state takes a fair-minded approach and tries to apply laws that upheld both family and liberty.    I don&#039;t know what Rifqa wants, but it does seem to me that she should be given the chance to make up her mind without coercion from any and all sides.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Lanier (Facebook):</p>
<p>&#8220;What a strange case!  I&#8217;m not entirely sure what to think.  However, it does seem like in cases like this, a thoughtful judge would consider it from a &#8220;secularized&#8221; or &#8220;laws-in-common&#8221; approach, trying to see all aspects of the case and make a just decision.   A secular approach here  merely means that the state takes a fair-minded approach and tries to apply laws that upheld both family and liberty.    I don&#8217;t know what Rifqa wants, but it does seem to me that she should be given the chance to make up her mind without coercion from any and all sides.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
